Feature Requests

Currently, Liongard pulls the Account Policy information from the Default Domain Policy. As a rule most Administrators avoid making changes to this policy as it is not recommended by Microsoft and I personally know that it is against standard U.S. DoD Policies. As CMMC (Standards for Civilian Companies with contracts with the DoD) is rolled out across the U.S. there will be more and more Admins that do not make changes to the default domain policy. So Liongard should consider allowing clients to decide which Group Policy the Account Policy Metrics come from.

To maintain separation of data between child companies, it would be nice to be able to have the ability to map multiple Liongard environments to one company in ConnectWise. This allows data to stay separate in our documentation as well.

I want to be able to compare a metric for the count of workstations with Liongard installed against a metric for the count of workstations with Cisco Umbrella installed. It would be helpful if I could trigger a rule when the count for Cisco Umbrella is less than the count for Liongard. Additionally, I would like the alert to show the discrepancy via a list in the body of the alert content. This feature would enhance the flexibility and functionality of the rule-building system.

Showing the User name exactly who made changes in Inspectors and Systems

I need to monitor who made modifications or deletions of FileServer files via Liongard. Currently, Liongard can detect modifications and deletions using Actionable Alerts, but it cannot identify the user responsible for these changes. It would be beneficial to have this capability to enhance security and accountability.

Similar to this Feature Request or Roadmap board, can we get one for known bugs with Liongard. We had this come up in a call with our rep and engineer for a known Device Asset bug we discussed. This would cutdown on putting in support tickets if we already know its been flagged and being addressed by Liongard.

Only users licensed for Defender are discovered. Policies for Defender are not pulled by the Data Print (ie, Anti-spam, anti-phishing, etc and policy drifts) If possible, please add the polices for Defender

Would be nice if we could collect bitlocker recovery keys automatically instead of manually recording them for all computers.

365 Admin, Reports, Usage, Sharepoint, Storage https://admin.cloud.microsoft/?#/reportsUsage/SharePointStorage Can help determine when SP is full tenant wide TicketID#41479918